• Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23–40. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
• Amuso, V., & Van Woensel, L. (2025). Reflections on applying systems thinking to stakeholder mapping: The STOA Unit at the European Parliament. Global Policy, 16(2), 403–409. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13494
• Andersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Schneider, J. W., & Sørensen, M. P. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions. Technology in Society, 81, 102813. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813
• Aiken, C., Tananbaum, G., Dunham, J., Kinoshita, R., & McKiernan, E. (2025, June). Opportunities in open science, metascience, and artificial intelligence [Workshop report]. Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
• Blau, W., Cerf, V. G., Enriquez, J., Francisco, J. S., Gasser, U., Gray, M. L., Greaves, M., Grosz, B. J., Jamieson, K. H., Haug, G. H., Hennessy, J. L., Horvitz, E., Kaiser, D. I., London, A. J., Lovell-Badge, R., McNutt, M. K., Minow, M., Mitchell, T. M., Ness, S., … Witherell, M. (2024). Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(22), e2407886121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2407886121
• Edwards-Schachter, M. (2024). The Promises of Responsible Open Science: Is Institutionalization of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness Enough? (DOI: 10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95876)
• European Commission. (2025). A European strategy for artificial intelligence in science: Paving the way for the Resource for AI Science in Europe (RAISE) (COM(2025) 724 final).
• Falling Walls Foundation. (2025). Key results of the round table “Science integrity in the age of artificial intelligence”.
• Gadd, E., & Jennings, P. (2025, July 7, 2025). Is there a place for AI in research assessment? LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog.
• Guest, O., & van Rooij, I. (2025). Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Psychologists (PsyArXiv preprint). doi:10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj
• Guest, O., Suarez, M., & van Rooij, I. (2025). Towards critical artificial intelligence literacies: Methods and modalities for academic and societal engagement (Zenodo preprint). doi:10.5281/zenodo.17786243
• Guest, O., Suarez, M., Müller, B., van Meerkerk, E., Oude Groote Beverborg, A., de Haan, R., Reyes Elizondo, A., Blokpoel, M., Scharfenberg, N., Kleinherenbrink, A., Camerino, I., Woensdregt, M., Monett, D., Brown, J., Avraamidou, L., Alenda-Demoutiez, J., Hermans, F., & van Rooij, I. (2025). Against the Uncritical Adoption of “AI” Technologies in Academia (Zenodo preprint). doi:10.5281/zenodo.17065099
• Hartzog, W. & Silbey, J. M. (2025). How AI destroys institutions (Working paper). SSRN (ID 5870623).
• Helregel, W. (2025). AI and Open Science: Implications and library practice recommendations. Library Trends, 73(2). doi:10.1353/lib.2025.a961191
• Hosseini, M., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Holmes, K., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025). Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities. Quantitative Science Studies, 6, 22–45. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00337
• Jabarian, M., & Imas, A. (2025). Artificial writing and automated detection (NBER w34223). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w34223
• Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2025). How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database full-text analysis (arXiv preprint). arXiv:2509.09596
• Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Gadd, E. (2025). Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF 2021 (arXiv preprint). arXiv:2512.05202
• Kwon, D. (2024, December 9). Publishers are selling papers to train AIs — and making millions of dollars. Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-024-04018-5
• Lorenz, P., K. Perset and J. Berryhill (2023), “Initial policy considerations for generative artificial intelligence”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 1, OECD Publishing, Paris.