Opening (0:00–0:02)

“Welcome everyone — thank you for joining this foresight workshop on how Open Science and generative AI, and what this means for scientific exchange in Europe. Today we’ll pressure-test the scenario clustering, extract systemic risks, prioritize the risks most likely to appear, and identify actionable countermeasures — with an explicit European Parliament lens.”

Ground rules (0:02–0:04)

“A few quick ground rules: concise interventions, assume good intent, and please help me timebox. We’ll work fast and capture outputs in structured templates so nothing gets lost.”

Lightning scenario reads (0:04–0:08)

“I’ll invite each of you to read one scenario snippet/title — about 30–45 seconds each. As you listen, note: what future logic is implied, and what risk is hinted.”

(After reads)

“Thank you — we already hear diverse futures: governance shifts, infrastructure concentration, new validation norms, and contested incentives.”

Your study framing (0:08–0:20)

“Let me anchor this in the study context for the European Parliament…”

(Your 12-min slide talk: status quo OS×AI, tensions, risks, drivers)

Close framing with:

“What I need from you today is not agreement on one ‘true’ future — but a robust set of plausible futures, the risks they generate, and policy options that are credible in the EP context.”

Pre-clustering check (0:20–0:28)

“Here are the four pre-clusters. I’ll keep labels high-level. In the next eight minutes: what is clearly coherent, what feels misplaced, and what’s missing?”

Prompt questions:

• “Which scenario feels like it belongs elsewhere — and why?”
• “Does each cluster have a distinct ‘logic of exchange’?”
• “Are we missing a cluster? Does one scenario speak for another cluster? Name it?”

Conclude: